{"id":98,"date":"2020-09-19T07:59:16","date_gmt":"2020-09-19T07:59:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rvkassociates.com\/blog\/?p=98"},"modified":"2020-09-19T07:59:22","modified_gmt":"2020-09-19T07:59:22","slug":"automation-of-income-recognition-asset-classification-and-provisioning-processes-in-banks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/automation-of-income-recognition-asset-classification-and-provisioning-processes-in-banks\/","title":{"rendered":"Automation of Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning processes in  banks"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>RBI\/2020-21\/37&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ref. No. DoS.CO.PPG.\/SEC.03\/11.01.005\/2020-21 September 14, 2020&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Chairman \/ Managing Director \/ Chief Executive Officer&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs) and&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All Small Finance Banks&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Madam \/ Dear Sir,&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Automation of Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning processes in<\/strong><strong>&nbsp; <\/strong><strong>banks<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We invite a reference to our circular DBS.CO.PPD.No.1950\/11.01.005\/2011-12 dated August&nbsp; 04, 2011, in terms of which banks were advised, <em>inter alia, <\/em>to have appropriate IT system in&nbsp; place for identification of Non-Performing Assets (NPA) and generation of related data\/returns, both for regulatory reporting and bank\u2019s own MIS requirements. It is, however, observed that&nbsp; the processes for NPA identification, income recognition, provisioning and generation of related&nbsp; returns in many banks are not yet fully automated. Banks are still found to be resorting to&nbsp; manual identification of NPA and also over-riding the system generated asset classification by&nbsp; manual intervention in a routine manner.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. In order to ensure the completeness and integrity of the automated Asset Classification&nbsp; (classification of advances\/investments as NPA\/NPI and their upgradation), Provisioning&nbsp; calculation and Income Recognition processes, banks are advised to put in place \/ upgrade their&nbsp; systems to conform to the following guidelines latest by June 30, 2021.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Coverage:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.1 All borrowal accounts, including temporary overdrafts, irrespective of size, sector or types of&nbsp; limits, shall be covered in the automated IT based system (System) for asset classification,&nbsp; upgradation, and provisioning processes. Banks\u2019 investments shall also be covered under the&nbsp; System.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.2 Asset classification rules shall be configured in the System, in compliance with the\u00a0 regulatory stipulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.3 Calculation of provisioning requirement shall also be System based as per pre-set rules for&nbsp; various categories of assets, value of security as captured in the System and any other&nbsp; regulatory stipulations issued from time to time on provisioning requirements.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.4 In addition, income recognition\/derecognition in case of impaired assets (NPAs\/NPIs) shall be system driven and amount required to be reversed from the income account should be&nbsp; obtained from the System without any manual intervention.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.5 The System shall handle both down-grade and upgrade of accounts through Straight&nbsp; Through Process (STP) without manual intervention.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Frequency:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.6 The System based asset classification shall be an ongoing exercise for both down-gradation&nbsp; and up-gradation of accounts. Banks should ensure that the asset classification status is&nbsp; updated as part of day end process. Banks should also be able to generate classification&nbsp; status report at any given point of time with actual date of classification of assets as&nbsp; NPAs\/NPIs.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Exceptions:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.7 Exceptions may be granted from System driven classification in certain circumstances,&nbsp; which are expected to be minimum and temporary. It may be emphasised that these&nbsp; exceptions are from automated classification and not from IRAC norms and shall be subject&nbsp; to the conditions as explained below.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.8 Banks shall not resort to manual intervention \/ over-ride in the System based asset&nbsp; classification process. In any exceptional circumstance where manual intervention is&nbsp; required to override the System classification, it must have at least two level authorisation.&nbsp; Such delegation of powers for authorising the exceptions should be as per the Board&nbsp; approved policy of the bank (by CEO, in case of unavailability of Board) and preferably&nbsp; should be done from the centralised location and suitably documented. Further, any such&nbsp; intervention shall have appropriate audit trails and subjected to audit by concurrent and&nbsp; statutory auditors. Detail reports of such manual intervention shall be placed before the&nbsp; Audit Committee \/ Audit Head (banks having no Board) regularly.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.9 Banks shall maintain logs for all exceptions i.e. manual interventions \/ over-rides including,\u00a0 but not limited to, the date and time stamp; purpose\/reason; user-IDs, name and designation\u00a0 of those making such manual intervention and necessary account details. These logs shall also be stored for a minimum period of three years and not be tampered with during the\u00a0 storage period. These logs shall be system generated.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>System Requirements and System Audit:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.10 In case a separate application outside the CBS is used as the System for NPA\/NPI identification and\/or classification, the System must have access to the required data from&nbsp; the CBS and\/or other relevant applications of the bank and the borrower\/investment accounts&nbsp; shall be updated back into the CBS automatically, wherever applicable, through STP.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.11 Banks shall keep the business logic and other parameters\/configurations of the System&nbsp; updated to ensure that the System based identification, classification, provisioning and&nbsp; income recognition are strictly in compliance with the regulatory guidelines on an ongoing&nbsp; basis. There should be periodic system audit, at least once in a year, by Internal \/ External&nbsp; Auditors who are well versed with the system audit both on system parameters as also from&nbsp; the perspective of compliance to Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning&nbsp; guidelines.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>General:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.12 Banks may draw up their standard operating procedure (SOP) for System based NPA&nbsp; classification for usage by the operating staff.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2.13 Baseline requirements for the NPA classification have been provided in the Annex.&nbsp; Banks are required to adhere to these instructions while designing and maintaining the&nbsp; System.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. The adherence to these instructions will be examined as part of supervisory assessment&nbsp; of the banks and in case of non-compliance, suitable supervisory \/ enforcement action shall be&nbsp; initiated against the concerned bank.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yours faithfully,&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Ajay Kumar Choudhary)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chief General Manager&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Encl: As above (Annex)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Annex<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Baseline Requirements for the NPA classification Solution&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>I. Data Input&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. Data Input in the system by any means should be fully captured and stored without&nbsp; truncation [For example, time stamp &#8211; with date and time, narration field, or any other text&nbsp; data captured].&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. Ensure presence of necessary validation\/verification checks in the solution for the user&nbsp; inputs, wherever applicable. Such validations, among other things should check for data type&nbsp; validations, min\/max value, exceptions, etc.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. Ensure necessary data validation\/checks in the system for the data keyed in manually,&nbsp; wherever applicable. For example, such validations with master data (or parameters used in&nbsp; asset classification fed into the system as per the internal policy of the bank) could prevent&nbsp; issues related to incorrect entries generally seen (illustrative but not exhaustive list) in&nbsp; margin setting, moratorium period, security valuation, repayment schedule, products&nbsp; mapped\/linked to different categories of account holders (as per applicability) etc.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. Data input shall be effected only after authentication and authorisation.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>II. User Access Management&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>5. Ensure that all \u201cuser-ids\u201d in the solution have unique identification. If there are any generic&nbsp; user-ids used, it should only be used under exceptional circumstances and such ids should be&nbsp; mandatorily mapped to the employee ID of the user to fix accountability of the activities&nbsp; carried-out under the generic ID.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>6. Provide for two-factor or higher level of authentication for the users of the application. 7. Restrict the access to the solution on \u201cneed to have\/least privilege\u201d basis for all users. 8. Provide for maker checker authorisation \/control for transactions (an illustrative list of&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>transactions includes updating\/modifying the internal accounts, customer accounts,&nbsp; parameters \u2013 both financial and non-financial that affect the status of the credit&nbsp; portfolio\/loan\/asset.) entered in the solution. This shall also include transactions\/activities&nbsp; carried out by administrator accounts in the application. (For example: Activities such as&nbsp; create\/update\/modify user-ids, roles, privileges including access rights to various modules;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>system related activities including updates to master data, etc. should have at least two\u00a0 individuals to complete the activity).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>III. Straight Through Processing (STP)&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>9. Provide for straight-through processing (STP) and support for STP integration with all&nbsp; critical systems\/add-on sub-systems\/modules etc., in a seamless and secure manner for&nbsp; NPA\/NPI classification as per extant guidelines on IRAC. Such STP mechanism shall&nbsp; seamlessly take into account all the facilities availed by a given customer (in case of&nbsp; advances) and all the instruments of an entity (where bank has made investments in an&nbsp; entity), maintained across multiple systems of the bank without any manual intervention.&nbsp; Further, banks shall also ensure that the updated account status, including asset classification&nbsp; of the customer accounts, flow to the CBS automatically, if NPA classification process is&nbsp; performed outside CBS.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>IV. Back-end Data Access Restriction&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>10. Any changes to the data, parameters from backend shall be avoided. The solution should&nbsp; provide for changes to the data items only through front end (from the application (Ex: CBS)&nbsp; itself and not through the backend database update) after requisite authorisation. Audit&nbsp; trails\/logs of access, changes to any data, parameters, if any, should be captured with&nbsp; specific user details in the system.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>11. In case of exceptions in rare circumstances, such changes should be duly approved at an&nbsp; appropriate level and documented. Provision for MIS report should be available to auditors&nbsp; to generate complete list of back-end access and changes made.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>V. Audit Logs&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>12. Provisions of audit trails\/logs to capture details of mandatory fields (that are essential to&nbsp; complete the transaction and essential to identify the transaction for audit\/forensic purpose in&nbsp; the future) of all the transactions (financial and non-financial) shall be made.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>13. Logs should be maintained for changing the master data. System generated activity logs of&nbsp; the users with administrative privileges should also be maintained.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>14. Secure storage and retention of logs in encrypted format with access controls in an archival&nbsp; solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>VI. System Generated NPAs\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>15. All parameters required for NPA\/NPI identification shall be captured in the CBS or&nbsp; associated sub-system(s)\/module(s) meant for NPA\/NPI identification\/classification of asset&nbsp; codes as per Income Recognition and Asset Classification (IRAC) norms and extant&nbsp; instructions. It should provide for separate MIS report capturing all parameters for NPA\/NPI&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>identification. Such parameters could either be configured in database or application itself as&nbsp; per the architecture of the solution\/sub-system.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>VII. Test Environment&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>16. The existing test environment in the bank with dummy data and functional logic similar to&nbsp; that of the product environment of the solution shall be made available to the supervisors&nbsp; during their onsite supervisory visit(s) as per the requirements. This shall be required, <em>inter&nbsp; alia<\/em>, to perform sample transactions review to assess whether the solution adheres in&nbsp; complying with regulatory prescriptions in the extant environment for NPA\/NPI&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>identification as per applicability.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*************************<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RBI\/2020-21\/37&nbsp; Ref. No. DoS.CO.PPG.\/SEC.03\/11.01.005\/2020-21 September 14, 2020&nbsp; The Chairman \/ Managing Director \/ Chief Executive Officer&nbsp; All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs) and&nbsp; All Small Finance Banks&nbsp;&nbsp; Madam \/ Dear Sir,&nbsp; Automation of Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning processes in&nbsp; banks&nbsp; We invite a reference to our circular DBS.CO.PPD.No.1950\/11.01.005\/2011-12 dated August&nbsp; 04, 2011, in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":48,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-circulars","category-rbi-circulars"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98\/revisions\/99"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rvks.in\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}